Where is MAURA MURRAY

PART TWO:

Diversionary tactic?

Civil suits allege that once Zemsky, Harary and Fareri realized they were in trouble with the SEC, they filed a series of lawsuits to deflect attention from themselves. Three suits were filed against Maj. Gen. Davidson, who in 2005 had agreed to purchase Secure Solutions as a shell for a startup homeland security company. Davidson was unaware that Harary and Fareri were manipulating the company's prices, said Davidson's attorney, René Harrod of Berger Singerman.

"We found out after we signed the agreement that it [the shell company] didn't seem quite right," she said. "Meanwhile, Zemsky and Harary and a few others are trading the shares to make the price go up, even though the company has no business and no assets."

In July 2005, after Secure Solutions hit a high of $9 a share, the SEC halted trading for 10 days and launched an investigation that ultimately revealed a multimillion-dollar market manipulation and kickback scheme, according to SEC documents.

Shortly thereafter, Zemsky, Harary and Fareri filed suits against Davidson and his business partner, Maj. Gen. Bruce Lawlor. Through a tangle of wives and mothers-in-law, whom they represented as shareholders, the trio sued the generals for defrauding Secure Solutions shareholders and diverting funds to themselves.

"The generals and other defendants had to spend a year and a half fighting these claims," Harrod said. "Then the SEC announced the settlement with Harary and Zemsky, and it comes out that they actually pled guilty to all the charges they were making against the generals."

Davidson has filed a countersuit against Zemsky and Harary for breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy. The suit alleges that, as a result of Zemsky and Harary's actions, Davidson incurred legal fees of more than $150,000 and lost $2.7 million in stock from his other company, Centuria Corp., which he gave to investors who had purchased Secure Solutions stock.

"The SEC and the DOJ have done a terrific job in unraveling this mess," Davidson said.

Retired Maj. Gen. Lawlor has asked the court to reopen the case against him, which was dismissed in March, and to impose sanctions against Fareri.

"Fareri caused this action to be initiated on behalf of plaintiffs to deflect from his part in the illegal stock manipulation scheme," the complaint reads. "Plaintiffs were not the victims of a fraud by defendants, but rather were the victims of a fraud perpetrated by their stockbroker, Fareri, and his cohorts, Zemsky and Harary."

On Dec. 4, representatives of the second shell company,

Tactical Solution Partners,

filed suit against Harary and Zemsky, accusing them of "hijacking and theft" of the shell company.

The suit alleges Harary and Fareri fraudulently obtained millions of shares and drove the stock price from $2.05 to $7 in 10 days. The stock fell to 70 cents within six months and was trading at 16 cents on Dec. 18.

Atlas' dual roles questioned
Adorno & Yoss attorney Atlas represented Harary, Fareri and Zemsky in suits against the generals while also representing Zemsky and Harary in the SEC investigation.

In their cases, Davidson and Lawler are asking the court to investigate whether Atlas and Adorno & Yoss should be sanctioned for prosecuting a fraudulent claim.

The question raised in the suits is whether Atlas, who served as counsel until he withdrew in November 2006, knew his clients were being investigated by the SEC on the same allegations that they were suing others for.

A court filing shows Atlas resigned due to "irreconcilable differences" with his clients.

Reached recently by phone, he declined to elaborate, saying: "I'm not in a position to discuss my relationship with any client."

PART THREE:

Parts one and two above from:

http://southflorida.bizjournals.com/southflor...

This stuff comes out of New Britain, Connecticut and nearby towns and cities such as Farmington, Meriden, Waterbury, Naugatuck, and others.

So I guess that explains why Gen. Bruce M. Lawlor was plastered on Patron System's website a while back.

"So what if someone lived there was being framed?
Most people know that when someone is missing it a 2 mile circle LE focus on then moves out as
clues roll in."

That's absolutely a possibility. Chris King came as close as possible to saying that Floyd did it. I don't think that he's necessarily trying to frame anyone, but he could easily be used to do so. Remember the "story" (lie, fabrication, etc) that Maura was "dating" Floyd's son? Something that turned out to be completely false and then just "went away." If that's not an attempt by someone to frame Floyd (who, by the way, I think is "scum" so I'm hardly looking to protect him!)- I don't know what is such an attempt.

Advocator said that Maura could have been a victim of a carjacking, which may not have happened anywhere near Swiftwater.

I also believe that it's entirely possible that Brian Rooney has many more victims than we know about yet, and he could have been in the area.

elsewherebriefly wrote:

<quoted text>if your wife really loved and trusted you she wouldn't have believed the cops

?

elsewherebriefly wrote:

<quoted text>if your wife really loved and trusted you she wouldn't have believed the cops

:(

elsewherebriefly wrote:

<quoted text>if your wife really loved and trusted you

:-(

http://www.greenvilleonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll...

This sounds familiar. It doesn't say where he was or why he left.

yankee, yes, after a few days he returned, very nice.

I wanted to say that quite a few years ago friends of ours were placed in a witness protection program, although the family wasn't able to contact them in several years, from the beginning they knew they were in a protection program. It was difficult for all involved but they never had to search for them.

Harry, please...

Liked you better as Beagle. Please start talking Amherst along with Whiston. This is where the answers probably are..

Brian Rooney was working in the area of Haverhill when Maura went missing. I know this for a fact as I know his employer and he told me this in person. He was also driving a red pickup back then, a coincidence, I think not. It will all come out soon HOPEFULLY.!!!!!...Rooney is a sick person and capable of just about anything. Someone needs to go see Rooney and talk to him, maybe he will confess seing he is in prison for LIFE.

Reality Check wrote:

Brian Rooney was working in the area of Haverhill when Maura went missing. I know this for a fact as I know his employer and he told me this in person. He was also driving a red pickup back then, a coincidence, I think not. It will all come out soon HOPEFULLY.!!!!!...Rooney is a sick person and capable of just about anything. Someone needs to go see Rooney and talk to him, maybe he will confess seing he is in prison for LIFE.

Have you gone to the authorities about this?

All info has been given to the proper people. Did they do anything with this info, I do not know, but I would hope so.

I do not have much faith in LE or the justice system up here.

More sweet talk from those with love, love, love in their hearts.

Whiston does not talk about Amherst.

Whiston has never talked about Amherst.


Whiston has not made a single declarative statement about Amherst.


Whiston has done nothing except encourage others to mine Amherst.

How come?

America's Most Wanted does not have her listed among the missing.(AMW.com ) Wonder why there is not more exposure?

STFU wrote:

[Amherst]is where the answers probably are..

Really? Amherst is where the answers probably are?

Why do you say this?

What answers, exactly, are in Amherst?

If you know so much, put YOUR answers - not more Whistonian questions - out on the table.

whiston is digging. why don't you stop your BS.