Where is MAURA MURRAY

Judged:

2

1

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
Care to share this information with us lesser privileged non-reporters, White Wash? Don't give me the line about protecting your source, either. Even as a reporter you are obligated to provide information to the police (with whom you are friendly, after all) if it will lead to uncovering or solving a crime. As someone--perhaps you yourself--recently posted regarding the PO Box.

Judged:

3

1

1

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
Care to share this information with us lesser privileged non-reporters, White Wash? Don't give me the line about protecting your source, either. Even as a reporter you are obligated to provide information to the police (with whom you are friendly, after all) if it will lead to uncovering or solving a crime. As someone--perhaps you yourself--recently posted regarding the PO Box.

Judged:

2

2

2

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
It is my understanding that there were TWO carpet samples taken, and that one is actually with LE.
<quoted text>
The knife was given to Fred because the man did not want to go to the police. And Fred TRIED to give it to LE, but they didn't want it. That's why he had to resort to mailing it, because once they open the mail they have to log it as received. You should know that, White Wash, with all your LE information. Those two statements are misleading, and I can only think they are intentionally so.
<quoted text>
Once again, am I the only one who is just now hearing that they did in fact ask for DNA samples?(which from what I knew was standard procedure, not something they waited to do until they had evidence)
Furthermore, that doesn't answer the question directly. A yes or no will suffice, White Wash: Was there DNA evidence discovered on the airbags (or elsewhere for that matter) by means of testing?

Judged:

3

3

3

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
It would not, however, prove WHERE Maura was driving when she had an accident that caused airbags to be deployed. Remember that accident reconstructionists have determined that the accident was not the scene where the car was found. And I also believe that it was determined (perhaps in fact by relatives of yours, whom I am certain you trust and I personally have no reason to doubt) that the air bags were NOT deployed at that same scene.
All DNA on an airbag proves is that Maura's head or face came in contact with the airbag at some point. It does not determine WHERE this happened, nor does it determine the CAUSE of those airbags deploying. Maura could have been forced off the road at a prior location, struck something that caused the airbags to deploy, and then taken somewhere.
I am not even saying that someone necessarily did this out of malice. Someone may have struck her car accidentally and then (god forbid) loaded an incapacitated Maura into another vehicle and dumped her car where it was found.
There are many scenarios not taken into account here.
I'm going to get the usual "occam's razor" reminders to keep it as simple as possible, and I would love to. However, this is clearly not a simple situation. Someone is missing. That's not simple.

Judged:

5

4

3

White Wash wrote:

I would like to point out the reconstructionist
has not seen the car in person!!
Has not been the area!
Has not seen actually photographs from that night!
<quoted text>

whiston wrote:

hi looking4amoose thanks for the help with the above do you know if this was the first the first actual news conference after Maura vanished.just trying to get an idea of which reporters were actually up in N.H. and which were getting the story over the phone etc. take care philip

Judged:

3

Harry wrote:

Was the Saturn hauled to the Woodsville area by an enclosed trailer registered to a business in New Britain, Connecticut?

Judged:

4

1

White Wash wrote:

I would like to point out the reconstructionist
has not seen the car in person!!
Has not been the area!
Has not seen actually photographs from that night!
So for me Personally I'm passing on this theory!
You are entitle to do as you wish!
You have posted it now let others do as they wish with the information!
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

White Wash wrote:

Lady Gray since you are the family spokes person and seem to have so much information.
My question is this was the inventory listed as
sports bra? Or UNDERWEAR? UNDERGARMENS?
What exactly was the termnology used on the inventory list?
<quoted text>

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer, do you know who owns that PO Box? You don't know that info is going to "family and friends". It could well be going to the investigators from the Molly Bish Foundation. Or the SP or the FBI, via the owners of that PO Box.
And frankly, can you blame Fred for not wanting any helpful info to go into the sinkhole of information that is his daughter's file at HPD?

Anne wrote:

Yes, it is interesting that most of the beginning articles and news spoke of the accident occurring at 7pm.

Anne wrote:

Yes, it is interesting that most of the beginning articles and news spoke of the accident occurring at 7pm.

Judged:

1

Wowzer wrote:

I had a conversation this evening with someone which brought to mind some questions.
When was the last time that any family member inquired as to any updates on the case with either HPD or SP and did they receive an answer to their questions? Anyone???????

Judged:

5

5

4

Wowzer wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how someone that doesn't live here can speak for the residents but when an actual local stands up for them they are jumped on and accused of speaking for the citizens.
How would you know for a fact that a lot of people do not trust the LE except for the fact of a certain few coming up on the weekends and saying they were told. What consists of a "lot" to you? 1, 10, 20, 50?

Judged:

2

1

1

get real wrote:

<quoted text>
This is an interesting question. What's the answer? I don't see one posted. Please give the post number in case I missed it.

Judged:

4

3

3

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
It's been answered already in a posting by Firecat. See below:
White Wash wrote:
Lady Gray since you are the family spokes person and seem to have so much information.
My question is this was the inventory listed as
sports bra? Or UNDERWEAR? UNDERGARMENS?
What exactly was the termnology used on the inventory list?
Firecat wrote:
If you read the post after that closely, you'll see she corrected herself immediately, and that sports bras for running and regular bras were both found, but not drawers.

Judged:

2

2

1

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
It's been answered already in a posting by Firecat. See below:
White Wash wrote:
Lady Gray since you are the family spokes person and seem to have so much information.
My question is this was the inventory listed as
sports bra? Or UNDERWEAR? UNDERGARMENS?
What exactly was the termnology used on the inventory list?
Firecat wrote:
If you read the post after that closely, you'll see she corrected herself immediately, and that sports bras for running and regular bras were both found, but not drawers.