Where is MAURA MURRAY

Judged:

3

3

2

Shack wrote:

PS regarding suicide..where and how could she hide her own body?.

Shack wrote:

looking4...the following is only one of several sites about Becket School
http://www.becket.org/schools/east_haverhill_...
Sophie, just shake your head and snicker. And, think amusing thoughts about genetic testing in Haverhill. Ya know, "I'm my own grampaaah".
Perhaps some of the residents are just plain angry because we know about so many criminal activities in the area. Maybe it has just been that way and they accept it. They don't want "outsiders" knowing their business.

Judged:

2

2

2

sheesh wrote:

Maura took tylenol PM for a running injury. what did she take during the day for that injury? why only tylenol PM.??

Judged:

4

4

3

elsewherebriefly wrote:

<quoted text>Maura's is a major criminal investigation being treated as a potential homicide with the 75% chance of a conviction.

sheesh wrote:

TY PM along with a lot of alcohol is deadly. That is why is it is questionable.

Judged:

2

2

1

WHITE WASH wrote:

Another Excellent Question!
Which you will not get answer for!
<quoted text>

WTF wrote:

I have been away camping in those dangerous woods in NH with no computer access. It has taken me a little time to try to figure out some of the conversation here. What I have figured out is that someone from Atlanta GA is using my moniker. That was not me. Anne was able to determine, from the lack of quality of the writing, no doubt ;) it wasn't me either. I don't know the extent of what has been said but I saw one remark in another forum (Deal reached for N.H. man...) that was not me. So far it appears that the person is from GA though that might be able to be faked. I have only been to GA once and don't plan on returning so if you see a WTF response from the state of GA it isn't me.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Just wondering, why you would make a statement like this while you claim you only want to find Maura? I know you said it was about a song but that's not how I'm reading it with the "genetic testing" words. Why would you want to discourage help from the Haverhill area by making such a hurtful comment?

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
According to Sharon, the Tylenol PM (which *I* had assumed was for the running injury, so if this confusion is my fault, I apologise) was because Maura had trouble sleeping when she was away from home. She often took it to help her sleep while visiting the Rausches, too.(Tylenol PM is essentially Tylenol with benadryl in it, before anyone goes off and accuses Maura of having a substance abuse problem by tying it to the alcohol.)
So she may not have been taking ANYTHING for her injury during the day. Also, I know from experience that running injuries that are muscle-related often bother you more at night when you are trying to sleep than in the day when you are able to move around and stretch it periodically.
Those looking for a fluffy tail, I am buried up past it in work, so I haven't been reading as much lately. But I haven't gone anywhere. Not to worry.
Also? I can't help but notice two things. One is that White Wash disappears while there's fruitful discussion, and then when things start to get accusatory and inflammatory and name calling starts, she pops right in and fans the flams.
The second thing is that she comes in here and accuses people of not searching for information and sticking to the facts, but she does not post facts. She posts accusations, fans flames, things that appear to be facts, and then when asked about the facts......either posts more accusations or disappears into the woodwork.
Several pages back by now, I asked White Wash to confirm something she posted as fact. She has not yet done so. I am noting this in particular because it is part of a pattern of behaviour.
I will ask again now.
WHITE WASH: You stated previously "why else would they ask for a DNA sample unless they had tested the airbags?" I noted evidence to the contrary that they had collected DNA evidence (from a toothbrush, a hairbrush, etc) to test against the underwear (you got all bent out of shape because I called them drawers--I never pretended to be LE or use their terminology, so that was entirely misplaced energy, as I was never pretending to answer the question you asked about the terminology and even stated so) that Kathleen found.
So I asked you. As I ask again.
WHITE WASH: Was there ever DNA testing done on EITHER OR BOTH of the airbags from the Saturn? If so, what were the results?
I will continue to wait for your answer. I have a feeling I will be waiting for quite a while, unless you decide to change your tactics.

Judged:

1

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
Except you just did. Hello, pot? This is kettle.
MAURA WAS NOT TAKING TYLENOL PM FOR A RUNNING INJURY. This is according to Sharon, Billy's mom. Maura was taking Tylenol PM because when she was away from home, she had trouble sleeping.
Therefore, it's unlikely she was taking anything at all--day or night--for her hamstring injury. Also, if my understanding of the nature of her injury is correct, there's pretty much nothing TO take, except anti-inflammatories such as ibuprofen. There's not a lot you do for a muscle injury, except rest it, ice it, and take anti-inflammatories.

WTF wrote:

<quoted text>
This can’t be right. It was a 75% chance a year or two ago. Surely by now it must be what??? 85% 95%. It might be 99%. Boy, wouldn’t that make everyone feel good. I’ll wait until someone says they have a warrant for an arrest. That will make me think 100% which actually has meaning.
And while we are picking nits here. It cannot possibly be a “75% chance of a conviction” not unless they can read the mind of jurors that haven't even been picked yet. Especially since they haven’t even named any suspect(s). I believe that it is more likely they are saying a 75% chance OF INDICTMENT. Maybe a subtle but a very important difference.
Bill

Quija wrote:

Some pages ago a poster wondered why th CW isn't discussed here much. Is he still living at the corner in the new house where his trailer was? Still working and going about life as before? Do posters think he's just a grumpy, embittered jerk who enjoys obstructing the LE's investigation? Heard he was an unpleasant, abusive man. Did he report his sighting of "a youngster running and hiding" in April or so, after a reward was offered? Long after it was known Maura was a runner? Never having met him, I have the "gut feeling" he delights in throwing a wrench into the works of others.(OMG - could he be one of the distracting posters here???????) Also "feel" he's smug like someone would who has a secret --- like knowing he was the one to give Maura a lift somewhere, and he'd be damned before giving out that helpful information. No facts here --- just tossing around in a small brain the timing of his return from that day's job in Franconia, his toying around with what he said he remembered doing that night (sleeping in front of the t.v.-- AT 1:00AM no less!!!, never seeing or hearing activity at the snowbank, etc.) He probably had nothing to do with Maura, IMO, because if it had been me who'd given her a ride I'd be terrified she left a hair, a tear, a kleenex, or a fiber in the vehicle, even if the ride was an innocent one. I'd be standing guard over my vehicle 24/7... He knew the police would need a warrant, but there were enough other interested citizens around that you'd think he'd be jumpy about that....

Judged:

1

1

1

sophie bean wrote:

WTF, I am sorry that it appears that Chris King has borrowed your identity, no doubt with your permission (I'm kidding, I don't believe that at all.) It kind of does highlight the fact that identity is not so easy to prove online.
But then, I am well-known to be biased since - unbeknownst to me - I am related to LK by nonexistent, never-was marriage, according to my nonexistent older sister.
Yeah, it's hard to keep up, even if you want to.