Where is MAURA MURRAY

"I think that what is being expressed is not a point of order, but a point of view. I am sure that it will be noted in the appropriate places. There is a rainbow of views to be expressed in this House and those views will be heard.

This is a very {Dogs barking] robust House, and hon. Members on both sides have to [glass shatters] discipline themselves [Creame pie hits backwall] and not throw creme pies [Dogs run to pie, barking] so that we read the questions that are put and the answers.[Interruption.] Order. Who brought in the dogs? It is extremely difficult for me,{Dogs barking] Some of them are noisier than others-- who threw the popcorn??... I saw that and I know who you are!{Dogs barking] There are occasions when I point {Bears howling] them out, if this goes on {Dogs run as bear approaches pie to eat]...."

Hi Jeff and all, Maura was asked to leave westpoint.Why i am not 100% sure.This is a fact.I posted that as an example of how we have been misinformed about many things since day one and even moreso why.take care philip

Mason,

Are you coming to the spiritual gathering at Dunkin Donuts on February 9th? I will be bringing Spot, my canine companion.

Tootles

While embarking amongst the moment in which we find our noble self drinking Thai Lattes at the round table of Dunkin Donuts, on Feb 9, reviewing our analyses of conjectures, our respective breaths smelling as we speak to one another, we musn't eschew canvassing the A-frame, collecting samples for posterity. Perchance LE or the FBI could be contact and invited to succour.

14 June 1796

My intent, My Lord, is to procure the establishment of Jefferson's plantation at Monticello for George Washington to fornicate with his mulatto concubines.

With honor,

Sgt. Admiral of the Royal Queen's Crown

Benjamin Franklyne
Philadelphia, PA

Sara wrote:

Just putting together the fact that a supposed witness said saw Maura Sunday morning, but her dad says he dropped her off in the afternoon. This is yet another inconsistent witness account, but in Amherst not New Hampshire. That is really odd. It is as if we have zero factual information on this case, but why is that. Either the witness was lying(why) or Fred is lying(why).

Sara:
eye witnesses are notorious for being WRONG! Fred is not lying, there is no reason for him to lie, he wants more than anything in the world to find Maura. He will never rest until Maura is found or his life is over, then I assume that Maura's other family members will continue, there are those here on this board and elsewhere who will never give it up until answers are found, not that we necessarily have to know the answers but that law enforcement brings this matter to justice, My guess is that the witness is wrong, perhaps looking for 15 minutes of fame, or he saw her at another time, say Saturday, or perhaps Monday.

Perhaps he/she could step up to the plate and enlighten us, or perhaps law enforcement might check out his statement again, or perhaps check out the person's background, and/or give them a polygraph.

whiston wrote:

Hi Jeff and all, Maura was asked to leave westpoint.Why i am not 100% sure.This is a fact.I posted that as an example of how we have been misinformed about many things since day one and even moreso why.take care philip

Whiston: Since you ask for answers frequently, I ask you forthright; How do you know Maura was asked to leave Westpoint, I have asked before, now again. Please, can you answer. Is this hearsay, or is the source reliable? Thank you.

Detective Columbo wrote:

Hello....
You must be mistaken...... I believe that I have not mentioned Raykel or anything about her in any of my posts. If I am wrong, Sorry, but my memory has no recollection of discussing this or any other forum.
Columbo

Weeper is the source for stating that the woman seen in the church was not Raykel, and that this was checked out by the PI's.

He stated that all sightings were checked out and lead no where, there was also a siting in a store, and the person said, she mouthed HELP, and I believe a disco in Vermont, or some public place in Vermont. Perhaps there are others, as when advised that the person was not Maura, I filled these sitings as dismissed.

Hi Peripeteia and all.I am sure Maura was asked to leave Westpoint.take care philip

Dawn wrote:

I find it very interesting that on my post about sex off. registry - 4 people voted it nuts - 4 - clueless.......... Look at the girl from oregon - convicted sex offendor.. the list goes on and on. Think about it.... They are convicts.......
That is one of the first things police check.. FYI so I'm not all that nutty

Dawn: as far as the internet information supplies
all 50 states of the Union have a sex registry,

New Hampshire:
http://www.egov.nh.gov/nsor/result.asp

how well this registry is kept up, what the criteria are for listing persons, I cannot speak to, however, if there are persons names missing, you might want to contact the authorities, or write to the contact on this site, or on the home page...

Sugar wrote:

There is good reason to believe that Maura Murray was acquainted with someone connected to the Rowland corruption scandal and who owned a residential property near SW.
Rowland was a high school wrestler on the same team as John Regan. Regan pleaded guilty to a charge of attempting to abduct a student track star from Saratoga Springs High School.
The school bus driven by Mr. Atwood was owned by by a company that has extremely close corporate connections to the executive jet charter company, Key Air, that provided Rowland with $91,000 of free air travel, mostly to Las Vegas. Rowland was sentenced to one year in jail, largely because of this free air travel.
To over-simply a bit, the company that owned the school bus company and which is very closely connected to Key Air had an office very near, almost across the street, from Kennedy dorm.
The same company, more or less, with the office across from Kennedy also paid a fee to John Regan's attorney shortly after Regan pleaded guilty.

Sugar: What is the good reason to believe that Maura was aquainted with this people, these persons? Because of close proximity to the building where she lived, an insurance company near by? What is the good reason to believe this statement you have made? I can't wait to hear!

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
...all over again.

like some kind of horrible repeating nightmare, like the bad penny that keeps coming back!

truth wrote:

I read this in an article:
"Sometime between Sunday and Monday morning, she packed up all her belongings in
her dorm room, to include taking all her pictures off the walls, taking
everything out of her bureaus,[and] put them all in boxes [and] left [them] on
her bed," Scarinza told WCVB-TV, "[She] left a personal note to her boyfriend on
top of the boxes."
Does any one have any idea what the 'note' said?

truth:

the note was discounted, as it was old, and had nothing to do with anything, related to why she packed up her boxes and leaving. Unless of course someone else packed her boxes and was trying to railroad a later investigation. What too we do not know if Maura had unpacked from her return from a month's vacation two weeks prior, but for sure Billy identified the note to be an old note, and there was nothing to infere running away or a suicide in the making.

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
There's no way of proving that the scent the dog (I believe there was only one dog) followed was Maura's. The dog was presented with a scent article--the gloves. The dog followed THAT SCENT to the stated point.
If someone else had the gloves on, that's whose scent the dog was following. The dog can't tell you WHO he's smelling, only where that smell went.
That's why they like to use articles that are deeply imbedded with one person's scent. Like, underwear is good, or gym socks, or a stuffed animal someone sleeps with every night. Something that's definitely that person.

Right, and at it has been said that there was as stuffed animal in the car that Maura considered very dear to her. Did she cuddle with the thing? Did she have it since a child? I remember someone saying they thought it would be a better scent object than the gloves. It also seems that person questioned FM's choosing of the gloves as the scent object when this stuffed animal was available.

Sara wrote:

Does anyone know if the tow truck driver that Maura rode with to Amherst was questioned for information? After all, the damage appears to be done by a tow.

Sara: are we sure that Maura drove back with the tow truck driver, if so good point. My understanding is that Maura had not drove the truth for several months.

freudian slip in above post to Sara:

sorry for the mistake: should have read not driven her CAR for several months, because of a cylinder being out, the car was towed just don't know when this was?

Therefore it is unlikely that she drove the car before going on vacation.

Does anyone know the time sequence of when Maura first had trouble with her car, when it was towed and if she drove her car over the holidays?

whiston wrote:

Hi Peripeteia and all.I am sure Maura was asked to leave Westpoint.take care philip

Whiston the question is, how are you sure, did someone tell you this, or are you surmizing because she simply left in the middle of her second year?

Please be specific, as this is vital, considering that several of the men there were latter charged with sexual assaults, and the announcement that a special enquiry was to commence by Rumsfeld. This was announced on Thursday the night Maura was reduced to tears while working as campus security; after receiving a phone call from somewhere on campus?

Thanks

Shack wrote:

I believe that Maura drove her father's new
Corolla from CT...following Fred driving the
Saturn. At what point, if at all, the
Saturn was towed to Amherst, I don't know.
Because I don't see what this has to do with
Maura's disappearance, I don't have to know.

thanks shack for the info...never read where she traveled in a tow truck back from CT.

hi Peripeteia.I know nothing about Maura or anybody else being involved in any sexual assaults or allegations that were made at Westpoint,other than what i have seen in the press.take care philip

Snowy White wrote:

<quoted text>
Nah, I didn't believe you...and, of course, you've got your facts mixed up, Mastermind/propaganda firetruck, et al. I've done the work.
You've misrepresented yourself and another...while endlessly shouting accusations about lying and cover ups...that is, unless you are one in the same.
I'll look more closely as you and Mason bash/target Fred Murray in a bid for new information.

Snowy, I don't even understand this message. What is it you don't believe? Mason did say "a great dad", but I took it out of context as a joke, so you need to lighten up a little bit and get down off that crybaby highchair of yours. You act like a little princess of ethics or something, and it comes off as snobbery. What work have you done? What are you talking about? You don't know the facts, the true nature of posters on this site, or anything else for that matter. You claim to, but your perception is clearly off. I find that those people who think they are the most perceptive are usually the most closed minded. So before you go judging me, go take a good look at yourself. I don't expect to ever know any more facts than what I already know (which isn't much, considering the twisted lies that are thrown to the posters on this site, for what, an attempt to throw people off or fish out a perp or whatever, but no one even knows if she is dead). So, don't go saying that I'm bashing FM because I am looking for facts. That's a misunderstanding on your part, and the fact that you use it against me just goes to show at what lengths you will go to discredit me. I'm simply questioning the inconsistent treatment towards certain inquiries. Some people will speculate all day long on the Haverhill accident, accussing everyone within a ten mile radius of the crash site of being responsible for Maura's disappearance, and when even the slightest inquiry into the nature of FM's character is brought up, this place goes bonkers. The inconsistency is astounding. We have no evidence that proves that she was ever in NH. We have PI's that act like psuedo-moderators whose reliability is questioned each and every day by multiple posters, and for good reason. PI's say over and over again that looking into Amherst is not important, and this is used against everyone who inquires about Maura's private life.