Where is MAURA MURRAY

Judged:

3

1

Anne wrote:

Lady Gray, I am local and among many whom do not feel or have ever felt attacked....let it go..it does not represent the majority of the citizenry of Haverhill and area.Do not bend toward this unbased criticism. There are those whom speak loudly with their cruel words that only reflect upon themselves.

Judged:

2

2

2

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh oh wait a minute....sorry, I've taken a short break and just now back, but HELLOOOOOO!!!! And for a different reason.
I'm going to list a timeline here. This is a very important timeline, and I'm referring to everyone reading this (Shack?), so pay very close attention to the dates. And the YEAR. This year has been corrected before but it has been ignored.
2004, May 29 - Maura's dorm items and computer retrieved from her dorm room by family.
2004, June 15 - Fred Murray files 1st Freedom of Information Act.
2004, June 22 - Fred Murray is informed that Major Crimes is involved in Maura's case.(hope!)
2004, June 25 - SIU of Major Crimes (State Police) go to the home of Maura's sister and retrieve items for which there is a signed receipt.
At the same time, the computer is retrieved. Receipt of the computer, by NH State Police, is NOT noted.
The items in Maura's dorm remained there until May 29th, 2004. Fred Murray had the hope that she would return. A parent's hope. He left her items in the dorm so they would be there when she returned.
What does one have if you don't have hope? You don't have a daughter. As Sharon has said, you lose your luggage, you don't lose a child.
Fred Murray has been played like a fiddle.

Judged:

3

3

2

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree completely. This is why I only check in every now and then....... It doesn't even matter what I post on here, I get blasted. Just wait and see the reaction to what I've posted and you'll get my point.

Judged:

2

1

1

WHITE WASH wrote:

Ever notice when you do check in
how prior to get it there is SERVERAL
theories and THOUGHTS going!
Only to have you DERAIL any and all
of this for PAGES.
For everything you deem FACT someone
can post actually documentation that
prove otherwise which you refuse to
view with any open mind.
Just my opinion if someone get blasted
all the time by all different times of
people would you begin to time it was
time for a new way of thing or atleast
approaching things?
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

1

Anne wrote:

Lady Gray, I am local and among many whom do not feel or have ever felt attacked....let it go..it does not represent the majority of the citizenry of Haverhill and area.Do not bend toward this unbased criticism. There are those whom speak loudly with their cruel words that only reflect upon themselves.

Anne wrote:

There are those whom speak loudly with their cruel words that only reflect upon themselves.

Judged:

4

4

4

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrath is, has been and will be exerted all around; however, presently, I see one group being on the defensive while the other group is portraying themselves as being representative of the overall sentiment of the area citizens and it isn't a representation that promotes nor portrays the true feeling of the area. It isn't.
If I were an area citizen, I would be embarrassed by those who come on here and say they speak on behalf of the area. I understand these alienated feelings go way back. I just wish all could put it behind.
I think it would be a great idea for an area media source to go around and read to the area citizens, the sentiments that are expressed on here and I would like for them to see the manner in which they are expressed.....with the venom and hatred that is portrayed.
I would like to see the reactions of these citizens as to whether they agree or not. I don't think it's the general consensus. This would all, of course, be with the understanding that it's confidential.
I think it would be best if it it's researched by the Caledonian.

Judged:

4

4

4

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
What I have posted is confirmed by the Murray family.

get real wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, and we know who they are, the attack ducks!

Judged:

2

2

1

mcsmom wrote:

HANSON - The family of a missing 22-year-old is demanding to know why police apparently failed to investigate one of the last telephone calls she made on the day she disappeared.
At 1 p.m. on Feb. 9, Maura Murray called a Wakefield couple who own a condominium at the Seasons at Attitash resort in Bartlett, N.H., that was for rent. Murray's family has stayed at the resort.
But the couple, Dominic and Linda Salamone, say they have never heard from investigators.
&#65533;&#65533;It's so upsetting,'' Linda Salamone said last night. &#65533;&#65533;I was the last person she talked to, so wouldn't I be the first person they would call to at least find out her state of mind?''
Murray made her last call at 2 p.m. on the same day to a toll-free number that offers information about lodging in Stowe, Vt.
Salamone said she did not know about Murray's mysterious disappearance until last month, when the mother of the young woman's boyfriend telephoned to ask about the February call.
&#65533;&#65533;I couldn't even tell her what she said because it was so long ago but I'm assuming she wanted to rent the place,'' Linda Salamone said.
Sharon Rausch, the mother of Murray's boyfriend, Army Lt. Bill Rausch, said she discovered the call to the Salamones last month when she looked over Murray's cell phone bill for February.
&#65533;&#65533;It blew our minds that it's now eight months later and we're finding out that (police) never even called these people,'' Rausch said.
New Hampshire State Police said the investigator who was given the phone records, Lt. John Scarinza, would not be available for comment until Monday.

Judged:

2

1

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh oh wait a minute....sorry, I've taken a short break and just now back, but HELLOOOOOO!!!! And for a different reason.
I'm going to list a timeline here. This is a very important timeline, and I'm referring to everyone reading this (Shack?), so pay very close attention to the dates. And the YEAR. This year has been corrected before but it has been ignored.
2004, May 29 - Maura's dorm items and computer retrieved from her dorm room by family.
2004, June 15 - Fred Murray files 1st Freedom of Information Act.
2004, June 22 - Fred Murray is informed that Major Crimes is involved in Maura's case.(hope!)
2004, June 25 - SIU of Major Crimes (State Police) go to the home of Maura's sister and retrieve items for which there is a signed receipt.
At the same time, the computer is retrieved. Receipt of the computer, by NH State Police, is NOT noted.
The items in Maura's dorm remained there until May 29th, 2004. Fred Murray had the hope that she would return. A parent's hope. He left her items in the dorm so they would be there when she returned.
What does one have if you don't have hope? You don't have a daughter. As Sharon has said, you lose your luggage, you don't lose a child.
Fred Murray has been played like a fiddle.

Judged:

3

1

Looking4AMoose wrote:

<quoted text>
I was the person who found the underwear at the base of the tree that weekend, but I knew very little about Maura and the search at that time. It was when I first learned of it and I was actually investigate a picture of someone else which had been rudely placed on the tree also. The picture was disturbing to me..........and I didn't know about the underwear found in other parts. When I returned to remove the picture, the underwear was gone.....apparently someone else took it.

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
Maura spent extended amounts of time at the home of Billy. Sharon has confirmed, with me last year, that while at their home, Maura would do her laundry, and, yes, she wore underwear.
Underwear was not included on the inventory.

Lady Gray wrote:

Actually, I need to clarify what I just posted. In Maura's luggage, were bra's for jogging and for everyday wear.
Panties were not on the inventory.

Judged:

2

2

2

whiston wrote:

hi all Kurts poem has always made intrigued me .how old was he when he wrote it.does he know why Maura may have left.no underwear found in the luggage who packed it.i think it is very weird that mrMurray did not stop in Amherst [i think you can see the campus from the interstate]to check in Mauras dorm room on his way up to N.H. Take care philip

Judged:

1

whiston wrote:

hi all Kurts poem has always made intrigued me .how old was he when he wrote it.does he know why Maura may have left.no underwear found in the luggage who packed it.i think it is very weird that mrMurray did not stop in Amherst [i think you can see the campus from the interstate]to check in Mauras dorm room on his way up to N.H. Take care philip

Quija wrote:

Hey WhiteWash, this is the poem/song I was talking about. Kurt wrote it. He is Maura's brother, younger, and there are some pics of him and Maura still shown on the MMM website.
What i wouldn't give
Where have you run
Is there somewhere that your new life has begun
Adrift
In a sea of endless time
What have we done
to make you turn your back on us and run
from our love
that will grow on your return
Why have you shunned
a life that you had only just begun
to live........to live........
Chorus
What i wouldn't give to only see your face
your radiant smile, flowing grace
if i could know for sure
that you've not been lost in time
and if you only knew
what your absence here has put us through
in hopes that someday soon
you might walk back through that door
Bridge
I know you're out there waiting
until the pain you feel subsides
but your fears, your doubts, your anger
with our love, we'll cast aside
Repeat chorus
Maura, we're missing you so dearly
we see your face so clearly
we pray with ever hopeful hearts
that you'll still walk back through that door.
"I'll always love you, wherever you are"
&#9829;&#9829;&#98 29; &#9829;&#9829; &#9829; &#9829;&#9829; &#9829;&#9829;&#98 29;

WHITE WASH wrote:

Ever notice when you do check in
how prior to get it there is SERVERAL
theories and THOUGHTS going!
Only to have you DERAIL any and all
of this for PAGES.
For everything you deem FACT someone
can post actually documentation that
prove otherwise which you refuse to
view with any open mind.
Just my opinion if someone get blasted
all the time by all different times of
people would you begin to time it was
time for a new way of thing or atleast
approaching things?
<quoted text>