Where is MAURA MURRAY

Judged:

3

3

2

elsewherebriefly wrote:

White Wash,
Do you happen to have Governor Benson's & Lynch's letters of reply to Mr. Murray?
As far as I know, the only reply Mr. Murray received was when he went to see Governor Lynch's office with camera's in tow from the national television syndicate 20/20 and was granted a 10 minute meeting behind closed doors.

Judged:

2

1

elsewherebriefly wrote:

Wowzer,
I'm pretty certain both Governor Benson & Lynch never replied to Mr. Murray's letters.
I know you don't like hearing that and I'm sorry.
I witnessed this happen to Bill O'Reilly and Wendy Murphy as well while they were attempting to gather facts and information pertaining to the progress of Jessica's Law.

Judged:

2

1

1

Wowzer wrote:

"Quote:
I remain convinced also that police have not fully developed a lead given to them concerning a local man who claimed he knew what had happened to "that girl" and disclosed the location where she had been held and by whom.Quote"
WW is this local man the same one that was supposed to have given the knife to Fred?
I'm surprised there is no mention of the knife or did that happen later with another local?

Judged:

3

1

1

elsewherebriefly wrote:

Wowzer,
I'm pretty certain both Governor Benson & Lynch never replied to Mr. Murray's letters.
I know you don't like hearing that and I'm sorry.
I witnessed this happen to Bill O'Reilly and Wendy Murphy as well while they were attempting to gather facts and information pertaining to the progress of Jessica's Law.

Judged:

3

3

3

White Wash wrote:

Wowzer I'm not sure will need to do some
research and get back to you on that.
I want to know how Shack knew it kind of
blood it was if the carpet was lost by the PI's.
Of course Shack's cousin has the rental dates of
the A-Frame but we've never able to see that either how do we know Claude was renting it?
<quoted text>

Judged:

3

3

3

GatorChamps2006 wrote:

<quoted text>
Awww, the poor little virgin got offended again? Poor baby. How SAD are you that you feel that you have to say something to every post that comes from "Tampa, FL"? My thought process is apparently much too sophisticated for you to comprehend. You're not bright enough to effectively interpret simple details. What you said did not only not make sense, it didn't even tie into anything I remarked on. Being the fat ugly pathetic virgin nerd that you are, you intentionally left out the beginning of that post which would prove how profoundly stupid you, once again, have proven to be. You just can't help yourself.
Keep crying every time I insult you, respond back to every single "Tampa, FL" post regardless of how little sense you make, and attempt everything you can think of because of how I shitted on you.
My sincere apologies to all in this forum for annihilating "Benjamin Franklyne" publicly like this and not talking about Maura, BUT his unprecedented acrimony and his consistent bitter remarks to every single post that anyone from "Tampa, FL" makes, many of which aren't even from the person he's going out of his way to try and insult, warranted me being honest with him.

peripeteia Nova Scotia wrote:

<quoted text>
Columbo, I take it you are saying that the time of the accident is as reported by Faith, at 1926, and reported at 1927? This you believe is the time that FW heard the thump? Did this correspond to the time that JM gave for hearing the accident?
I find Weepers post very interesting, regarding the phone call made to 911.
quoted
Now we come to the second witness “on scene” who was much closer to the Saturn than anyone else that night, while it was occupied. We all have heard the many variations of what he stated about what was said to him and what he claims to have seen. Over the years the media, police and everyone else continues to quote Mr. Atwood’s version of events from that evening because it all seemed to fit, on the surface. However, his actions that evening were very peculiar to his neighbors. One action in particular stands out, the way he parked the bus that evening. He backed the bus all the way up beside the house to an outbuilding and after a brief moment when he went into the house and told his live in girlfriend what happened (she was in fact the person who called the Grafton County Sherriff’s Department) he went back out and sat in the bus until Sgt. Smith walked down and spoke to him through the open door. To grasp the oddity of this action (as his neighbor did that evening) we need to understand that his girlfriend also drove a full size school bus and they always parked them in front of the house where the State installed a large floodlight (just like a street light on a public street) right on his property at the intersection with Bradley Hill Road. Had he parked his bus in it’s “usual” parking spot he would have had a clear, unobstructed view all the way up to the stranded Saturn, 560 feet (I measured it). He also claimed to have seen several vehicles pass that intersection but couldn’t identify any of them. He had never parked his bus like this, before or after, since that evening. This witness’s statements and actions leave a lot to the imagination. Mr. Atwood knows a lot more about what happened that evening but he’s not talking, especially to our investigators. He may have given LE different statements but those documents are not available to the public or the PI Team (as I said before, we don’t want them nor do we need them).
Weeper on Topix #5386
Here Weeper states that the phone call was made by his wife/girlfriend? One would thing that in the few minutes it would take to tell his wife that he had "seen" the accident and they did not know where the girl is",this likely puts him on the bus, having left for his bus allot earlier than stated in the press. The police had already arrived he said, since he left the phone call business to his partner, he was in the bus much longer than indicated in his statements to police.
This makes the statement of the neighbour about the SBD staying on his bus along time more clear,
and questionable if he ever got off the bus..other than for a minute or two...
In over four years I took the word of the SBD, that he made the phone call to the press. This multiples his deception considerably, in that none of the five versions he gave to the press of what he did after he left the scene of the accident are factual. Very disturbing...

Judged:

2

2

1

White Wash wrote:

Yes this is the same computer Fred had from
Feb to April and sat idle where?

Judged:

2

2

1

Wowzer wrote:

<quoted text>
Two pieces of carpet, supposedly lost and/or not tested by either the PI's or the LE but yet info surfaces that says it was menstrual blood that was found on the carpet.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that someone had to have tested it to find out that information. I've wondered about this for a long time since I don't remember Shack ever explaining how she knew this. I think she even disappeared for a few days after dropping that bomb and would'nt answer any questions about it if I remember correctly. Maybe it was dropped by accident and we weren't supposed to know about it. What else I wonder are we not supposed to know about that is being kept a big secret?

Judged:

2

Anne wrote:

Elsewhere, I've never seen any response to Fred's letter and since it was covered by news media, any response would more than likely be reported to the papers distribution.
I was thinking this morning about living in the middle of nowhere, that's what I chose and love. Also there probably are a few scum bags around and its too bad Chris Gray and a couple other people were not more aware of it.
Wowzer you're right, the only thing that matters is the truth.

Big Rad wrote:

<quoted text>Or maybe it was supposed to look like a big secret. I doubt very much it was dropped by accident. Ditto for the repeated but contrived mention of birth control pills.

Big Rad wrote:

<quoted text>
Correct. And that's a fact. F-A-C-T.
It's an Amherst related fact, but a fact just the same.
There are plenty of facts relating to Amherst, and almost no facts, according to many, relating to Haverhill.
Why is the discussion so focused on Haverhill, a place where, it is frequently complained by those obsessed solely with what MIGHT have happened in Haverhill, so few facts exist? And yet there is so little useful discussion of Amherst, a place where so many facts exist?
Why is the discussion so weighted toward a place where so little is known, yet any discussion of where much can be learned is so jeered at, discouraged, and undermined?
And that's another F-A-C-T

Judged:

2

1

1

GatorChamps2006 wrote:

<quoted text>
HAHA wow the pseudo-intelligible virgin antisocial computer nerd just took a considerable length of time and used all the effort he could have in attempting so pathetically to find something, anything that he can use to try and disparage me solely because he's utterly spiteful and sadly vindictive.
Once again, you've exposed your multiple insecurities publicly. But in doing so, you also managed to advance your blatantly illogical thought process in attempting to metaphorically tie a number of made-up remarks to something I said, yet it didn't work to people who can actually follow what you said. I clearly explained that intelligent, engaged college women about to graduate don't RUN AWAY - I didn't say that they don't take weekend trips in cars during the winter time, because nearly all of them do at one point or another, with many taking multiple trips. It's not unusual to pack up your belongings and take off somewhere. Students do this all the time. I suspect you don't and never did have many friends though. Because you, specifically, have a limited mental capacity, your brain does not allow you to creatively come to the same conclusions that many of the investigators have come to based on all known factual details, which is that she had a REASON for going up there - we (publicly) just don't know why yet. Even, for arguments sake, if she didn't have a reason to leave, taking off for a weekend outing or some random time off is enormously prevalent among college students.
It's not your fault you're stupid. You were born this way. Intelligence is inherited genetically, so blame your parents.
How beautiful it is that you continue to remain oblivious to how you prove my points regarding how precedented and pathetically laughable you are in everything you say and everything you do: It's to the point where you sit on your computer on this forum all day (which you've been doing for years), wait for ANY response from a "Tampa, FL" location and come up with the most illogical, irrational and ostensibly bitter responses in order to do your best to try to get at me! HAHAH you're so fucking pitiful. You're obviously the type of person who thinks that people are stupid and you can't be read from a mile away.

Big Rad wrote:

Is it possible that Maura Murray left Amherst on Sunday, February 8, 2004 instead of the next day, Monday?
Did any well fields or other sources of public drinking water receive a delivery of any water purification chemicals on or around Monday, February 9, 2004?
Is there a source of public drinking water near the Lisbon Railroad Museum?
Thank you.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mason wrote:

Part 2 of 2
You need to learn how to write and a good place to start would be to acquire a dictionary, thesaurus, and Strunk & White. Get your post up on your screen and apply the following rule. OMIT NEEDLESS WORDS. That means eliminate all the adverbs you adore.
What distinguishes a bitter response from an "ostensibly bitter response," or an illogical thought process from a "blatantly illogical thought process?" As long as we're discussing logic, what's the difference between an illogical thought and a "blatantly illogical thought process?"
Can a response be vindictive but not spiteful? Is a spiteful remark also "utterly spiteful?" Can a remark be sad, or just a person? Is my remark "sadly vindictive, or vindictive?"
Call me stupid, but I can't visualize a "pseudo-intelligible virgin antisocial computer nerd." Since you've called him a "virgin," are we to suppose that you have devoted yourself from afar to studying his sexual behavior? Did you spend "a considerable length of time" or just a long time documenting his private life through your sex-telescope in Tampa? How much do those things cost? If I bought one, would it help me to understand what you meant by "attempting to metaphorically tie a number of made-up remarks to something I said?"
You should consider entering your post as is in the annual Bulwer-Lytton contest that celebrates bad writing. Excellent writers struggle to produce verbal diarrhea like yours. You are blessed and might win a cash prize.
Before you decide to show-off your awesome mind again, you might profit by first considering your remark about intelligence. You said, "It's not your fault you're stupid. You were born this way. Intelligence is inherited genetically, so blame your parents."
Gosh dang it! Is there another way to inherit a genetic trait other than genetically? Perhaps you will find your answer in the sex telescope you so vigorously, viciously, and vituperatively stroke to mangle the English language.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mason wrote:

Call me stupid...