Where is MAURA MURRAY

Benjamin Franklyne wrote:

HAHAHA I love listening to mafiosos with pampadaaaawrz - this one in particular has spent his entire life wishing he could find a conf file and when he hears about someone doing it, he naturally becomes envious and jealous. I don't just think - I am absolutely 100% certain that "Johnny Bravado" has never once cd'ed into the /etc directory and he never will. He knows it and Bob Dole knows it.
"Johnny Bravado" has proven beyond any doubt that he has absolutely no Unix skills, and his hard drive has probably lost integrity.
***He knows very well that he's just copying and pasting if - then statements into emacs*** and he doesn't care the least bit about how utterly pathetic that is - he just can't man up and use vi. It doesn't bother him at all if he logs in as root; he's been using the toor user his whole life. He can't even come up with a shell script; his brain cannot think on such a level.
He's been so affected by the GPL, that he is now trying to use the Mozilla Public License. This is <Insert Word From The Superior Intellect's Dictionary> one of the most pitifully repulsive KDE users I've ever encountered, and I've been to a lot of Kiosks. He knows I'm right too. His text processing experience must truly suck. Hey "Johnny Bravado", how does it feel to know that we all know you can't use Plan 9?
You couldn't even look at the last five operating systems I've booted into, let alone compile a kernel. Women are perceptive; they can tell if you compiled drivers into your kernel for unused hardware! They know your X window system has a memory leak, just as I do.
You'll never set your Samba level to become a PDC; you'll just keep on wishing it will just happen. You'll never be able to think modularly; ***you'll just keep copying and pasting my words to try to and appear intelligible.**** I wouldn't expect anything less from such a naturally pitiful sow.
If you're going to come to Silicon Valley, bring your software. Although the locals don't tend to have implanted "bouncers" - unlike your own - the women here are more interested in intellectual pursuits.

HAHA OMG!!! Benjamin Franklyne!! YOU'RE SO FUNNY DUDE! OMG!!!- THAT WAS HILARIOUS! fucking ****DORK****

Within Benjamin Franklyne's exceptionally limited mental capacity, he told himself as he was writing that, "Since he was making fun of propaganda firetruck for copying and pasting his words, and he made fun of my computer skills which made me cry and hurt me to the core since my pitifully pathetic life revolves solely around the Internet, I'm going to copy and paste his words and implement my wannabe-computer nerdery!! I'm SO CLEVER!! THIS IS GOING TO BE SO FUNNY! OMG! EVERYONE ON THE FORUM IS GOING TO LOVE ME AFTER THEY SEE HOW CLEVER AND WITTY AND FUNNY I AM!"

Benjamin Franklyne's worthlessness is exemplified by the fact that his entire life is spent on the Internet, yet despite this, there are 12-year-olds that would mortify him when it comes to knowing the Internet because his brain is only capable of learning so much. See, the only thing that Benjamin Franklyne has in his life that even gives him a shred of self-esteem is his very limited knowledge of the Internet. He knows nothing else, nor can he learn anything else. He won't ever deny that his life revolves around the Internet, and he knows very well that he's ugly, dumb, antisocial, and either really fat or really skinny, which explains why he can't do anything or involve himself in the real world outside of the computer. It also explains why he's the one and only person on this forum who backs up "propaganda firetruck" - he understands what it feels like to be genuinely pathetic.

Benjamin Franklyne wrote:

<quoted text>
Bob Dole likes dollar bills. Bob Dole will be book signing and pole dancing at Cheeta in Sarasota.

Do all wannabe computer nerds babble incoherently on forum posts after they've been exposed and repeatedly embarrassed? You genuinely are as pathetic as they come. You're not even remotely funny, and the only thing you accomplish by your utterly sad posts is exposing to the rest of us how pitiful you are. How must it feel to know that you're obsessed with someone on the Internet (your home) because they've effortlessly revealed the truth about you? I'm sure your obsessive, stalker-type incoherent posts, which apparently can only be comprehended by someone who shares your minuscule intellect, make you feel better when you read them to yourself. Since you know very well that you'll never be allowed to get into a club like Cheetah, psychologically it makes perfect sense that you would make a poor attempt to make fun of it. It also makes perfect sense why you respond to each and every single post I make, irrespective of how unrelated it is to you - you've been so sincerely offended by the truth I've exposed about you that you cannot allow yourself to let me get away with saying something; you feel obligated to say something, anything, even if it's as unfunny, corny and incoherent as possible. It's your duty as a nerd! Keep it up!

My apologies to the rest of you on this forum. Benjamin Franklyne's stalker-type obsession with me and his constant pitiful remarks to anything I post warrants me to clearly explain how psychologically distorted this pathetic young man is. He still cannot comprehend this though; it's like trying to explain what color is to someone who was born blind.

Advocator wrote:

<quoted text>
You've totally lost me here. I never said any such thing or even implied it. You said you had done a lot on this case. Well, easy to "say". We haven't seen much of anything from you to even suggest that. Your posts mostly consist of bashing propaganda firetruck. You don't discuss Maura's missing, your posts actually show very little interest in her case.
<quoted text>
If I thought you might have any unique AND USEFUL information, I'd highly recommend you share it with the NHSP or one of the PIs, rather than here.
<quoted text>
You're right, rantings between a couple of superannuated ego-maniacs ought to be ignored. Unfortunately for the rest of us, we never know when a post might include some tiny useful bit of information about Maura, and so we tend to read most everything on here looking for that one little thing that might make the difference and help in finding this girl. The fact that so many posts here (including yours) are just chaff blown around for your own self-amusement is pretty sad.
<quoted text>
If it means absolutely nothing to you whether or not we know of what you've done, then why keep announcing that you've done so much? The one stance contradicts the other.

Obviously you need things analyzed and broken down for you by someone else too because you certainly cannot do this yourself, and I'll be happy to do so. However, I can perceive right away that, even after everything is broken down piece-by-piece for you, you're may still have trouble in your comprehension. If you had trouble absorbing it the first time around, I imagine you're going to run into the same trouble again. But I'll keep my fingers crossed for you.

(a) I had initially said that I've basically done a lot for this case, more than most. Your response to this was "Sez you" - but somehow you cannot absorb how you "even implied" expecting me to post information. Somehow this doesn't surprise me, but I'll be happy to break it down for you. Saying "Sez you" to such a response is synonymous with saying "How do I know you're telling the truth? I'm just going off what you say," hence 'Sez you'. One defense you can attempt to argue is that you were simply acknowledging what I had said by saying "Sez you" - in other words, you weren't trying to subliminally imply anything, but rather acknowledging my efforts. However, anyone with the street-smarts of a rat knows exactly what's implied when you respond to such a statement with "Sez you." Now, to prove this directly and also to explain how you contradicted yourself within two sentences, you remark "we haven't seen anything from you to suggest that" - suggest that I've done more for this case than most? My "posts usually are bashing.." OK, so you're ostensibly saying that you EXPECT me to explain publicly on this forum each and every detail that I've uncovered or discovered, regardless of how damaging the details may be? And if I don't, then I "haven't made anything to suggest that" I've done a lot for this case. "Haven't made anything to suggest that", without the pronouns, is saying "haven't made any posts to suggest you've done more for this case or have unique information." You've made two consecutive posts now that support this unreasonable expectation of yours. This was so blatantly obvious that it's sad that I even had to break it down like this. Either you're incredibly dumb or you intentionally lied and said you weren't trying to imply anything when you know very well you were, as this is as obvious as can be from the wording. And my posts show "very little interest in this case"? Since you're such an expert on my posts, tell me, how many posts have I made altogether? And for how long have I been posting on this forum? What percentage of my posts are about Maura and what percentage is bashing propaganda firetruck?

..continued..

(b) If *YOU* think I have useful information, you'd recommend I give it to the NHSP or a PI? OH, REALLY? Gee, thanks for the information. I had no idea. What in the name of fuck makes you believe I haven't been exchanging info with them for however long? What do you know about me or what I've done? Absolutely nothing. But of course, I haven't posted each and every detail of what I've done and what I know on this forum. Contrary to your beliefs, not everyone involved on this case posts all of their information on a TOPIX forum. Frankly, if one single person with unique information ever posted it on this forum, I'd be dumbfounded and outraged. But, on the other hand, you've implied you EXPECT it to be posted or the person's not credible.

(c) "Unfortunately for the rest of us, we never know when a post might include some tiny useful bit of information about Maura, and so we tend to read most everything on here looking for that one little thing that might make the difference and help in finding this girl." OK, so two paragraphs into one of my posts where I was analyzing propaganda firetruck's stupidity, you couldn't discern that there may or may not be information about Maura, right? The entire basis of my post up until that point is an analysis of propaganda firetruck's stupidity, but you don't realize that the rest of the post is going to be relatively the same so you're still going to go ahead and read the rest of it because it MAY include some information on Maura? You're not just going to scroll by the rest of it because you may miss something, right? Sounds reasonable. I wouldn't call propaganda firetruck an egomaniac though - in order to possess a substantial ego, you actually have to have attained a significant level of success based on unique skills or intellect. However, men who haven't attained this, particularly pseudo-intellectuals in college but also to men of all ages, are innately envious and jealous when they encounter someone who has attained this. In real life, they cannot confront these individuals they are envious of because it's usually someone infinitely better than they are and they're naturally intimidated, but on the Internet they let loose. Benjamin Franklyne and "propaganda firetruck" are two perfect examples of this.

(d) "If it means absolutely nothing to you whether or not we know of what you've done, then why keep announcing that you've done so much? The one stance contradicts the other." In all my time on this forum, the only time I've ever 'announced' that I've done 'so much' was in my response to Lady Gray, and that was only mentioned as a response to her specific post. I've NEVER bragged or stressed that I've done "so much", so to say that I keep announcing that I've done so much is not only false, but it's a lie. It's an intentional lie that you created so that you could follow up by saying that I've been contradicting myself. I've never contradicted myself. It does mean absolutely nothing to me whether you know of what I've done. There are others on this forum who I stay in touch with regularly through other web sites, but not on this forum. I care about whether THEY know what I've done, but they're an exception only because some of them share bits and pieces of unique information.

In all sincerity, I take absolutely no amusement in any disparaging posts towards anybody - every negative post I've made has always been a response to something directed at me.

Dawn --- I know you were just talking about what art Maura might've been interested in --- not the older photographer!(See, it was me who had been wondering about her having an interest in a younger artist or administrator there...)

Beagle --- Fernald and other institutions have quite a history, don't they? I knew kids from Fernald.

Suzanne --- Sorry if it looked like i just paraphrased your post! I started out just chiming in that i felt the same way...

FireCat --- In a pinch (sorry) I sort of like the generic term "underpants". One problem, tho, is that it has far too many syllables; i mean it seems like a lot more than THREE! However --- it's gender-free, it sounds a little like what Alaskans or hunters might layer up with; it's a heftier, more materially-substantial-soundin g word than the prissy word "panties" which I refuse to ever use (I'm grimacing as i write it), because "panties" evokes pink and lace and wedgies and roll-downs and General Discomfort.(I worked under him at a job once.)(Oops -- poor choice of words.) It evokes adolescent males twirling said item high in the air on an index finger as a female jumps and tries to reach it. I hate that word more and more.

peripeteia wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks Snowy for posting the article,I did not see the bottom part of the article on right hand side, which states that the Middlebury police believe the article was more than two years old. Seems I made a mistake as this is the article I read. Sorry indeed, I guess guilt as charged Wowzer of trying to start a rumour. Teach me to speed read and not to look closely.
Suzanne, seems you might be correct that there is no foul play, perhaps this is so, perhaps not as the police said Maura ran away likely to commit suicide in the White Mountains.

thanks, Peri...i'd only followed with some interest until the final discovery of Garza's body, due to my interest in the St. Lawrence University connection.

Dawn, thanks so much for linking the Seventeen book! I'd never seen it and now I can go read it.

quija wrote:

Beagle --- Fernald and other institutions have quite a history, don't they? I knew kids from Fernald.
**yes, the horrors of Fernald...shameful history. the question about where Maura was staying on campus is a biggie...and i suspect you want to leap to connecting her disappearance to those contacts.
Amherst is impt., just from a logical point of view.

FireCat --- In a pinch (sorry) I sort of like the generic term "underpants". One problem, tho, is that it has far too many syllables; i mean it seems like a lot more than THREE! However --- it's gender-free, it sounds a little like what Alaskans or hunters might layer up with; it's a heftier, more materially-substantial-soundin g word than the prissy word "panties" which I refuse to ever use (I'm grimacing as i write it), because "panties" evokes pink and lace and wedgies and roll-downs and General Discomfort.(I worked under him at a job once.)(Oops -- poor choice of words.) It evokes adolescent males twirling said item high in the air on an index finger as a female jumps and tries to reach it. I hate that word more and more.

**both of you are hysterically funny...i dunno' what's in the water here in MA, but the subject should definitely be further explored over tea or wine, or even by the ladies on The View.
my mother balked at the word "panties", most likely because it's often used in the context of men reporting about a criminal act involving them.
my grandmother wore "bloomers". did yours?
FC's "a$$pants" has some generic appeal. everyone immediately knows how they function.
this, and words-we-love/words-that-annoy ...to be continued.**

Peri, there are apparently two kinds of SAR scent dogs. One kind follows air scent, and the other follows ground scent. And then there are sub-specialties. Fascinating stuff. Beth taught us that.

http://animals.ho wstuffworks.
com/animal-facts/
sar-dog2.htm

Good evening.

This is the 37th time I have emailed you from this computer, where I have accomplished nothing of importance. Each time I have done so to discuss with you some matter that I believed affected the Maura Murray Case, when in fact, I was not.

In all the decisions I have made in my Internet life, I have always tried to do what was best for the Maura Murray Case. Throughout the long and difficult period of investigating, I have felt it was my duty to persevere, to make every possible effort to complete the task.

In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that I don't have enough information to justify continuing that effort.

I would have preferred to carry through to the finish whatever the personal agony it would have involved, and my cats Schmiggins and Hattie unanimously urged me to do so.

I have never been a quitter. To quit my work before the investigation is completed is abhorrent to every instinct in my body.

Therefore, I shall resign my investigative efforts, effective at noon tomorrow. With Johnny Bravado taking my place on the team, I know that the investigation will be in GOOD HANDS.

Sometimes I have succeeded and sometimes I have failed, but always I have taken heart from what Theodore Roosevelt once said about the man in the arena, "whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again because there is not effort without error and shortcoming, but who does actually strive to do the deed, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumphs of high achievements and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly."

HAHA OMG!!! Johnny Bravado!! YOU'RE SO FUNNY DUDE! OMG!!!- THAT WAS HILARIOUS! fucking ****DORK****

Within Johnny Bravado's exceptionally limited mental capacity, he told himself as he was writing that, "Since he was making fun of me for copying and pasting his words, and he made fun of my computer skills which made me cry and hurt me to the core since my pitifully pathetic life revolves solely around the Internet, I'm going to copy and paste his words and implement my wannabe-computer nerdery!! I'm SO CLEVER!! THIS IS GOING TO BE SO FUNNY! OMG! EVERYONE ON THE FORUM IS GOING TO LOVE ME AFTER THEY SEE HOW CLEVER AND WITTY AND FUNNY I AM!"

Johnny Bravado's worthlessness is exemplified by the fact that his entire life is spent on the Internet, yet despite this, there are 12-year-olds that would mortify him when it comes to knowing the Internet because his brain is only capable of learning so much. See, the only thing that Johnny Bravado has in his life that even gives him a shred of self-esteem is his very limited knowledge of the Internet. He knows nothing else, nor can he learn anything else. He won't ever deny that his life revolves around the Internet, and he knows very well that he's ugly, dumb, antisocial, and either really fat or really skinny, which explains why he can't do anything or involve himself in the real world outside of the computer. It also explains why he's the one and only person on this forum who backs up "himself" - he understands what it feels like to be genuinely pathetic.

Do all wannabe Strip Club Pit Bosses babble incoherently on forum posts after they've been exposed and repeatedly embarrassed? You genuinely are as pathetic as they come. You're not even remotely funny, and the only thing you accomplish by your utterly sad posts is exposing to the rest of us how pitiful you are. How must it feel to know that you're obsessed with someone on the Internet (your home) because they've effortlessly revealed the truth about you? I'm sure your obsessive, mafioso-type incoherent posts, which apparently can only be comprehended by someone who shares your minuscule intellect, make you feel better when you read them to yourself. Since you know very well that you'll never be good enough to compile a kernel, psychologically it makes perfect sense that you would make a poor attempt to make fun of it. It also makes perfect sense why you respond to each and every single post I make, irrespective of how unrelated it is to you - you've been so sincerely offended by the truth I've exposed about you that you cannot allow yourself to let me get away with saying something; you feel obligated to say something, anything, even if it's as unfunny, corny and incoherent as possible. It's your duty as a nerd! Keep it up!

My apologies to the rest of you on this forum. Johnny Bravado's stalker-type obsession with me and his constant pitiful remarks to anything I post warrants me to clearly explain how psychologically distorted this pathetic young man is. He still cannot comprehend this though; it's like trying to explain what color is to someone who was born blind.

To clear up the canada theory.

I own a home in Birch Bay WA - which is 5 minutes from the Canadian border. I think it is highly unlikely she was able to cross into Canada. After 9/11 everyone is photographed while going across -when in car - when you pull up a grey box right past the border agents booth. Walking same thing. There are cameras recording everything. They ask questions and she would have needed a passport or birth cert to cross and both are kept on record.

Also not the RCMP - royal canadian mountain police - are held in very high regard. I rent my house out now - I did get both american and canadian news at home prior to moving. They are much more outspoken than we are about their govt and the RCMP are NOT known for bothching cases or cover ups.

Shack
Since there is a search planned for this spring. Where do the dogs come in from ?? I know they needed supplies for the last searcher. That is something we could all do from afar.
We could do a fundraiser to help support the efforts

When is the snow melted from the area?

Are there dates planned for the search?

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2009/0...

I never like going in this direction.

Very intersting how the dogs work - we all smell different when alive. When deceased - we all smell the same - so the dogs do not need a piece of clothing.

They can actually smell the best under water

Profazio testified that records show Knox's and Sollecito's cell phones were switched off at around 8:30 p.m. on the night of the murder, making their whereabouts untraceable.

this was posted about Amanda Knox case

again... cell phones can trace where you are..........even just by being powered on

A second witness, police officer Marco Chiacchiera, said no record was found of a telephone call that Sollecito claims to have received on his apartment landline at 11 p.m.

landline phone - check check

Hope to get some answers to my posts.. It is month end so it is really slow.. Next week I probably won't be around much.

Hope to get answers on

college phones system - what was used at the time? was it a soft phone - on the desk top - a black phone with a orange button on right - typical phone with a pbx

search ? When ? Supplies Needed?

Contribute funds?

Searchers - need housing, food, dogs need food ? find other dog handlers to volunteer - maybe never heard of Maura Murrays case. Watching MSNBC today.. they could still get a hit 5 years later.

For all of you - I did offer to contribute some time ago to the reward fund. If she is found I will put in $$ to the reward as well.

On reward.. I was told - only reward money will be paid if found safe and sound............ For those that think she is alive.... prove it please.. and get your reward.