|
FireCat
United States
|
Judged:
1
1
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>
You clearly demonstrate that finding Maura is not worth even considering that the phone call may have come from a pharmacist. Your first and constant reaction is to ram the thought into eternal darkness. You have plenty of time to BASH, BASH, BASH, and talk about all kinds of other things, but you are NOT committed to finding Maura or what happened to her. Are you afraid that if you try to follow this line of thinking that you will waste your time? From doing what? From constant bad mouthing and bashing? From constant attention to a fruitless quest to solve who knows what about the Rt. 112 crash site?
And it's really, really curious how defensive and angry and sarcastic you get when you criticize the only poster - at least the only poster who admits it - who actually lives in the area where Marua was last seen.
You reserve the greatest scorn and venom for the one person who might actually know his own backyard. That's a scary thought for you, isn't it?
If you follow leads that might not go anywhere, then you are not willing to follow any lead at all because the only thing you and all the other liars in this thread discuss is one place, Rt. 112 in Haverhill - which has been relied on for five years now to go absolutely nowhere.
How committed you are to finding Maura that you will endlessly bash theories that might possibly go somewhere - but, of course, they might not, so you don't want to be associated with them. In order to go SOMEwhere, you have to START somewhere. WITH AN OPEN MIND.
After all you have said, it is perfectly reasonable to question your desire to find Maura Murray. You subsequently rephrased the pharmacist thing as a question, which I find a much more reasonable presentation. Theoretically it IS possible, yes. But at present I, personally, have no reason to believe so. Do you? Once again, Alden, you'll know if and when I'm bashing you. This wasn't it. This was me pointing out the flaw in the logic the way you originally presented that theory. (And for the record, if and when I bash you, it will not include references to homosexuality. I don't find that characteristic offensive in a person.) Speaking of which, I'm off to meet a gender-bending friend for supper. Yes, Mason, I hang out with faggots and dykes and people of indeterminate gender identity, even though I'm a breeder. Everybody try not to take everything personally while I'm gone,'kay? Peace out.
|
|
FireCat
United States
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>Sorry, the school bus driver. The bus company was owned, for all practical purposes, by someone with an office across from SW. That does not mean the owner is guilty of anything. It just means that someone near the office, physically or electronically, may have used the proximity to his advantage. Gotcha. Yes, you've mentioned the First Student connection several times. Thanks for clarifying that. It's what I was pretty sure you meant, but the first time I read the post I did a double-take.
|
|
John
Alexandria, VA
|
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
........um, that would be NO, she wasn't. That's just silly. Relax dude. It was a joke in the context of the jocularity of posts at that time.
|
|
Beagle
United States
|
Judged:
2
1
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
Jeez, I go away for 36 hours and the place goes to hell in a happy meal... If you think your Harry Met Sally return would change that for the better, you're wrong.
|
|
John
Alexandria, VA
|
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
.....and it may have come from Mortimer the Anteater, Bob the Builder, or Zelda the Flying Nun. There's NO evidence it may have come from a pharmacist. That's as ridiculous and random as saying Jackie did it.(by the way, you realize that you forgot to change your handle when you wrote that, so it sounds like John said it) If the suggestion there is that John is an alternate handle for Beagle, I am not. But here we go again with the insanity of this forum. And the JM comment was a joke re: the back and forth at that time. Let that go.
|
|
Beagle
United States
|
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
The window was broken FROM THE INSIDE, according to my sources (which are the same as your sources, I've just been staring at them for a few years longer, so I know stuff from memory) The only problem is that YOUR sources are professional liars.
|
|
John
Alexandria, VA
|
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
The window was broken FROM THE INSIDE, according to my sources (which are the same as your sources, I've just been staring at them for a few years longer, so I know stuff from memory) Thanks and thanks for back up on abuse report. I eventually found the discussion of the inside impact on 21.
|
|
FireCat
United States
|
John wrote: <quoted text>
Relax dude. It was a joke in the context of the jocularity of posts at that time. Oh good. In the midst of the weirdness, I couldn't tell. It seemed REALLY out of character for you, so I was hoping.
|
|
|
|
FireCat
United States
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>If you think your Harry Met Sally return would change that for the better, you're wrong. Well, a girl can always hope. Besides which, I was, as they say, kidding. Wait, why Harry Met Sally?
|
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Comments: 184
Shallotte, NC
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>
The only problem is that YOUR sources are professional liars. Detective Columbo, Weeper, and John Healy are not liars. It's your word against mine, remember that.
|
|
John
Alexandria, VA
|
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
Oh good. In the midst of the weirdness, I couldn't tell. It seemed REALLY out of character for you, so I was hoping. Well, I must admit that I got a little out of character yesterday, over the behavior of another poster who henceforth I will simply ignore. I have been taking some criticism for that today, so sorry if my response came off a little defensively.
|
|
Beagle
United States
|
FireCat wrote: <quoted text>
You subsequently rephrased the pharmacist thing as a question, which I find a much more reasonable presentation. Theoretically it IS possible, yes. But at present I, personally, have no reason to believe so. Do you?
Once again, Alden, you'll know if and when I'm bashing you. This wasn't it. This was me pointing out the flaw in the logic the way you originally presented that theory.
(And for the record, if and when I bash you, it will not include references to homosexuality. I don't find that characteristic offensive in a person.) Speaking of which, I'm off to meet a gender-bending friend for supper. Yes, Mason, I hang out with faggots and dykes and people of indeterminate gender identity, even though I'm a breeder.
Everybody try not to take everything personally while I'm gone,'kay?
Peace out. This represents one more attempt to bash and call it something else. The only thing FC breeds are lies and contempt for the truth. FC is making an effort to identify Beagle as Mason, which is absolutely false. I could as easly accuse FC as being Elsewherebriefly or any other poster out to lunch, or whatever. One of two things FC is trying to do is to make me say that yes, I have a reason to think the phone call from Londonderry tower was made by a pharmacist. She is deliberately trying to coax me into saying something more precise than is appropriate in this thread. She is doing what any cyberangel from hell would do. What any Curtis Sliwa would do. Lie, lie, lie.
|
|
Beagle
United States
|
Judged:
1
elsewherebriefly wrote: <quoted text>
Detective Columbo, Weeper, and John Healy are not liars.
It's your word against mine, remember that. Here's a perfect example of a statement by Elsewherebriefly that will not be clarified. It's oh so vaguely challenging, but there is nothing really mentioned. What the hell are you talking about EWB when you say it's "your word against mine?" Here's your chance. I challenge you. SPIT IT OUT. What do you mean?
|
|
John
Alexandria, VA
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>
This represents one more attempt to bash and call it something else. The only thing FC breeds are lies and contempt for the truth.
FC is making an effort to identify Beagle as Mason, which is absolutely false. I could as easly accuse FC as being Elsewherebriefly or any other poster out to lunch, or whatever.
One of two things FC is trying to do is to make me say that yes, I have a reason to think the phone call from Londonderry tower was made by a pharmacist. She is deliberately trying to coax me into saying something more precise than is appropriate in this thread. She is doing what any cyberangel from hell would do. What any Curtis Sliwa would do. Lie, lie, lie. Maybe firecat is simply curious as to why you are asking about a pharmacist connection. That's what it looks like to me. I also am curous about that.
|
|
John
Alexandria, VA
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>
This represents one more attempt to bash and call it something else. The only thing FC breeds are lies and contempt for the truth.
FC is making an effort to identify Beagle as Mason, which is absolutely false. I could as easly accuse FC as being Elsewherebriefly or any other poster out to lunch, or whatever.
One of two things FC is trying to do is to make me say that yes, I have a reason to think the phone call from Londonderry tower was made by a pharmacist. She is deliberately trying to coax me into saying something more precise than is appropriate in this thread. She is doing what any cyberangel from hell would do. What any Curtis Sliwa would do. Lie, lie, lie. Why do you attack people? Sometimes you seem to have so much to offer this forum. Other times you get nasty, evasive, vague and accusatory. Why?
|
|
FireCat
United States
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>
FC is making an effort to identify Beagle as Mason, which is absolutely false. Wait, what? I am? Um, no. Not so much, really. One of two things FC is trying to do is to make me say that yes, I have a reason to think the phone call from Londonderry tower was made by a pharmacist. She is deliberately trying to coax me into saying something more precise than is appropriate in this thread. I'm trying to find out what happened to Maura. If there's a fact, and you know it, you need to share it with the PIs and LE. If you don't want to share it with Topix, fine. That's your business. Why WOULDN'T I try to "make" you say yes you have a reason to think that? Why allude to it at all if you know it to be fact? She is doing what any cyberangel from hell would do. What any Curtis Sliwa would do. Lie, lie, lie. I'm afraid you've lost me there. I've no idea who Curtis Sliwa is. And to say I "never" lie would, of course, be a lie. We all are dishonest from time to time. "That dress looks lovely on you." "I did not have sex with that woman." "I cannot recall, Senator." "I swear I didn't even see it, Officer." But I have never been dishonest on this forum. My integrity is not in question with the people investigating Maura Murray's disappearance, and never has been. I am doing what anyone who is genuinely interested in finding Maura Murray would do. Asking questions and trying to make connections. You accused me not three pages ago of not honestly wanting to find Maura, and pooh-poohing (though of course you didn't use such a dopey Anglo-Irish term for it) anything that didn't fit into my alleged desired pattern. And then, when I DO attempt to question further, in an effort to try to understand how you see things and why your theory du jour is to be valued, you slam me again. Curious, that. And now, my anti-Valentine's dinner non-date.
|
|
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Comments: 184
Shallotte, NC
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>Here's a perfect example of a statement by Elsewherebriefly that will not be clarified. It's oh so vaguely challenging, but there is nothing really mentioned.
What the hell are you talking about EWB when you say it's "your word against mine?"
Here's your chance. I challenge you. SPIT IT OUT. What do you mean? I told you ages ago. I oon't trust you as far as I can throw you and for good reason. Over the past several months I've proven my point. I've used one moniker and have had the same ISP for six years, how about you?? By they way, Firecat was not implying you were Mason. You accused a small group of individuals who are involved in Maura's investigation as being pro life exterimist lesbian man haters - or something like that. Mason implied John was gay last night. She was simply killing two birds with one stone by addressing her open mind about homosexuality and the offense she took by both of your accusations and remarks.
|
|
FireCat
United States
|
John wrote: <quoted text>
Well, I must admit that I got a little out of character yesterday, over the behavior of another poster who henceforth I will simply ignore. I have been taking some criticism for that today, so sorry if my response came off a little defensively. Yup, we're all good, John.
|
|
FireCat
United States
|
Beagle wrote: <quoted text>Here's a perfect example of a statement by Elsewherebriefly that will not be clarified. It's oh so vaguely challenging, but there is nothing really mentioned.
What the hell are you talking about EWB when you say it's "your word against mine?"
Here's your chance. I challenge you. SPIT IT OUT. What do you mean? Actually, it's THEIR word against yours, Beagle. They're not liars. They are who and what they say, which on this forum is a rare and lovely thing.
|
|
Beagle
United States
|
Glycogenesys was, according to news reports, conducting trials of what the company described as a carbohydrate based drug for fighting cancer. It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as the company's leadership was turned over to a John Burns, formerly of South Shore Hospital in Weymouth. Glycogenesys was previously named SafeScience. A board member and I have had many close mutual friends. Also, a very close friend to my brother is the leading reason former Gov. Rowland went to jail. I know a bit more about the details of that case than the average person. I also know some people involved in the natural supplement business in the Amherst area. So if I suggest the call might have come from a pharmacist, I might have a good reason.
|
|
|
News Photos
Judge it!
Search the Franconia Forum:
Poll:
57°F
Cancer
Most Popular
