Where is MAURA MURRAY

Judged:

1

1

1

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
While the locations of SBD, CW etc have been DISCUSSED over the years, no one has made a public demand for either SBD's employment records nor CW's employment records to prove they were where they said they were.
Can you just imagine what the reaction would be if Leatherman had demanded the employment records of SBD or CW?
I shudder to think of the reactions.

elsewhebriefly wrote:

<quoted text>
Sara,
This is incorrect. I have been following Maura's disappearance/investigation for about 5 years and the thought never crossed my mind either.
I provided that link to another site where some random poster brought the issue up and a poster (Peabody) that I've known of and trusted over the years replied.
Read the link and decide for yourself.
I personally find the recent allegations against Mr. Murray ludicrous and libelous.

Judged:

2

2

1

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
While the locations of SBD, CW etc have been DISCUSSED over the years, no one has made a public demand for either SBD's employment records nor CW's employment records to prove they were where they said they were.
Can you just imagine what the reaction would be if Leatherman had demanded the employment records of SBD or CW?
I shudder to think of the reactions.

Judged:

1

White Wash wrote:

I personally find the allegations against
LE,the witnesses,Fire,Rescue,Towing,c ompanies
and anyone who had been misquoted just as
ludicrous and libelous.
Those who demand should be prepare to be demanded upon!
I personally find the recent allegations against Mr. Murray ludicrous and libelous.
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

1

White Wash wrote:

Really?
I disagree how many contacted the bus
company for his trip to wild cat and what
school he was driving for.
How many people have clocked the trip to Lincoln
for CW how about certain people posting about his
children where they went to school.
How about Weeper following CW and parked out there hours taking notes of
who is coming and going?
Do you want to discuss Weeper's chat with CW's girlfriend at the time?
Speaking of smelling like BS!
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

2

Dawn wrote:

If you back to when I first joined beg of Dec - the entire forum was talking about SBD at that time.. I remember because I could not for the life of me figure out what SBD or CW - and I have seen BA's name dragged through the mud on here.......... many times.
we aren't asking for mud
we are askign for proof he was work - libel ? for what?
as mason said to me - in the biz they say take 5 - that means the 5th ammendment. why do people take 5 anyway? from a legal point of view... huh?
you are on a roll WW..:-)

Judged:

4

4

4

Anne wrote:

It helped us be productive.

Judged:

4

2

1

Lady Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
While the locations of SBD, CW etc have been DISCUSSED over the years, no one has made a public demand for either SBD's employment records nor CW's employment records to prove they were where they said they were.
Can you just imagine what the reaction would be if Leatherman had demanded the employment records of SBD or CW?
I shudder to think of the reactions.

Judged:

1

1

Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
Well why don't you please ask them for me?
I feel like I'm pulling teeth here.
I'm only asking for verification from his employer regarding the hours he worked on February 9, 2004 and February 10, 2004. I'm not asking for any other information. I don't want his SSN. I don't want to know his rate of pay. I'm not even asking to know what his work responsibilities were. I wouldn't even ask for his address and phone number except I want to send him the letter that I posted earlier.
Most important, if someone will provide me his address by PM on the other site, I won't even talk to him. He won't have to answer any questions.
Alternatively he could just authorize his employer to send me a certified copy of his hours on those dates with other information redacted. I'm trying to be reasonable here.

Judged:

1

1

flabergasted wrote:

<quoted text>
Lawyers are ethical??? Could of fooled me.

Judged:

2

1

1

Anne wrote:

Sara, I have been involved with Maura case about 4 and a half years. I never considered FM a suspect. That may be partially as I know LE question family first for involvement before moving on to others.
While I'm hear for any newcomers, FIT refers to a light moment members of the MMM were jokingly referred as Fit by Weeper,(forum in training) as investigators. Ducks were a fun night when a family member ran petrified from what she thought were attack ducks. Despite the betrayal by many these were things that lightened moments of tension, along with the tent, we went willingly or jokingly were sent by a moderator. It was a way of sharing in a real sense and releasing pent up anguish and frustration. I think it is important to know this as these symbols are continually desecrated here. It helped us be productive.

gvmeabrk wrote:

Could someone please repost WS forum for Maura. I had a correct shortcut but it no longer works.
Thank you in advance.