Where is MAURA MURRAY

This is the part that gets me.

"I am basing this plea on
the
present classification of my daughter’s case as a missing person situation and not
as a
criminal investigation. What could be the nature of this which must be so zealously
veiled
from view and the motivation prompting such secrecy?
With no informational resources available I am left to desperately search for Maura
all by
myself. How can I do this if the police sit idly on the applicable evidence? Take, for
example, her computer. If I could get it back, I might be able to discern who she
contacted
on that last afternoon and perhaps discover a new direction to follow. It’s one
thing if
Troop F isn’t willing to be part of the solution, but please don’t allow them to
continue to
be part of the problem."

That's just a bald faced lie since the computer sat in Kathleen's closet for God knows how long before the cops wanted it back.

Why does Fred Murray expect respect when he lies and dissembles like this?

This dude creeps me out.

Earthburner,

Thanks for posting these letters. Everything he wrote is bullshit, which I know is why you posted them. I can't help myself. Please stop me! I can't stop.

"My daughter, Maura Murray, went missing after a one car accident on February 9, 2004 at approximately 7:00 PM while she was heading east on Route 112 near North Haverhill, New
Hampshire. Eye witnesses place her at the crash site at one (1) to two (2) minutes before the
local police arrived and no one was seen to stop and pick her up in a vehicle. This means that
when the police reached the scene Maura could have been no further than a couple of
hundred yards up the road around the first corner walking away. Another witness who stopped and talked with her reported to the police upon their arrival that the driver of the
car was a young woman of approximately twenty (20) years of age. He added that he thought she had been drinking. There was an empty beer bottle found in the car and in addition,
there was a spider hole in the driver’s side of the windshield indicating that she had struck her
head at impact. The temperature that evening was twelve (12) degrees.
Given these known facts it was grossly negligent of the police to not dispatch a cruiser in
active pursuit in a spirited effort to retrieve an unsuspecting and vulnerable girl with a possible head injury and subject to hypothermia because of alcohol and frigid temperature
before she wandered into the pitch black of the national forest looming just ahead.
The police had full knowledge that if she were to encounter someone with ill intent that she
would have no place to hide, no place to run and absolutely no help available. Furthermore,
duty as well as common sense obligates the police to call ahead to the next town in the
direction they had to assume she was heading. They knew they had not passed her as they
drove east to the accident site during their response to the “911” call. The Woodstock police
were not notified nor asked to send an officer to intercept her by driving west in the direction in
which she was approaching.
She was figuratively and nearly literally “right there” readily available to be rescued and saved
from whatever fate has befallen her. All that the police had to do was to expend minimal
mental and physical effort and my daughter, Maura would be safely here with me today. But,
unfortunately, the police neglected to make even the most basic effort to find her, and I remain
without her now and perhaps forever.

Aside from the fact that his facts are not supported by the evidence and he he knew it when he wrote this garbage, he talks about his 22-year-old daughter like she's his wife.

Now that is one very sick and very disturbed dude.

I feel unclean after reading that letter.

Come on people!

How sick is that?

You know what's worse?

He doesn't even realize it!

That blows my mind!

Shack wrote:

Mellow..you are wrong...Helena's 2 Forums from
11/2004 -7/2008 ...56 months... lasted because of
the respect and comraderie of compassion...
Yes, intermingled with a bit of humanity and
light humerous moments within the many.
As the cranky, all knowing, bully mob snuck in,
Helena had had it....and here we be....
8 - 9 months of Topix...fewer months of Advocates
Forum....notice the lack of compassion.....?
Notice the influx of the snarly?
Remember that Fred and Laurie et al are grieving?
It is no longer the team for Maura. As said this
past 2/9/09 at Lodge...it's just entertainment.

Said the head duck wrangler.

earthburner wrote:

<quoted text>
I bet if I call you a white-haired molesting pig that you WILL feel obligated to post again, you retarded sack of shit. I find it hilarious that you think I would take any of this personally. You continually make a fool of yourself by making claims about my personal life that couldn't be further from the truth. Go ahead and try to insult me again, you are wasting your time. With each and every post, it's you that looks more like the fool, not me. You've always been on the defensive with your snide remarks, and to hide what? What is your agenda here if it is not to throw insults? What if I called you Fred Murray? Would that make you feel obligated to post? Come on. Post again. Once more for old times sake you SICK FUCK. I hope you and your clan of looneys ROT IN HELL.

Isn't Bravado the guy who bragged about his sexuality saying he owned a strip bar, lived with two gorgeous strippers with BIG BEAUTIFUL AMERICAN BREASTS, AND had non-stop sex 24/7?

Is he one of the Czechoslovakian Brothers from that Saturday Night Live routine years ago?

Well, if Fred Murray is Johnny Bravado, I think I now understand why he referred to Maura as a wife rather than a daughter and ignored that she would have been married to Billy, probably.

The question is how did he treat her when she was 10 or 12 or 14 and did it ever end until he ended it?

Now, I believe I understand why Maura didn't tell him that she just got engaged. She probably was afraid of what he might do to her.

I don't know what else to say.

G'nite WTF-KR-MY
whatever floats your boat..

jmlh wrote:

<quoted text>
Within 3 minutes I was able to find F.M.'s address and phone number. wasn't hard at all.

Well, send it to me because I can't find it.

Seriously, rereading Fred Murray's letters made me sick to my stomach.

jmth...only my words and advice..Pls,do not send
anything to him....if he isn't intelligent
enough to do it on his own...being a big deal
attorney....he can get one of his shallow
women secretaries to do it for him...with his
coffee.......
If you do not trust me..check with w/Helena.Pls.

jmth..also Frank/Weeper and John/Det.C. Please...

Please be careful...

what happened to all the other discussions everything is off now

It is after 3Am in New England..

Mason wrote:

Earthburner,
Thanks for posting these letters. Everything he wrote is bullshit, which I know is why you posted them. I can't help myself. Please stop me! I can't stop...
Aside from the fact that his facts are not supported by the evidence and he he knew it when he wrote this garbage, he talks about his 22-year-old daughter like she's his wife.
Now that is one very sick and very disturbed dude.
I feel unclean after reading that letter.
Come on people!
How sick is that?
You know what's worse?
He doesn't even realize it!
That blows my mind!

Got a daughter, Mason? I expect not.
Got empathy, Mason? Certainly not.
It's called grief, Mason. Apparently something that you've never experienced. He talks about his daughter as if she's missing and he's afraid that he will never see her again. Apparently you find it "unclean" and somehow perverse that a parent would be so upset over the loss of a nearly adult child.
Would it be more or less tolerable to you if a parent had actually had an adult child who was murdered, and who expressed similar grief and outrage?
If you have proof of anything, as self-proclaimed "officer of the court" -what are you doing here?
Why are you not presenting your fabricated proof to LE, as you are obligated to do as a self-proclaimed "officer of the court"?
Are you a defense attorney for someone with something to hide, Mason?
Doing a little pre-emptive trying of the case in the court of public opinion?
Ever hear of this thing called disbarment, Mason?
That is, assuming that you actually are a lawyer. We've seen nothing but your assertion to prove that claim.
Oh, I forgot - you "work with serial killers."
My mistake.

Shack wrote:

It is after 3Am in New England..

Looks like Topix is not showing all forums right now. Wonder what gives?

jmlh wrote:

<quoted text>
Within 3 minutes I was able to find F.M.'s address and phone number. wasn't hard at all.

JMLH, I was wondering when someone else would notice that.:) I guess he's used to having a para do the footwork for him.

Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
The ducks have earned the privilege of being condemned because you've never contributed a useful or helpful fact. You are members of a sorority that requires its members to swear undying devotion to Fred Murray and promise never to use their brains.
Yeah, a totally cool group of girls.

I think Bob, Frank, John, Earl, and others would be insulted by that insinuation, Mason.

Your intimidation tactics are getting old. And don't say they're not, because you once wrote a long PM to me explaining their usage against "John from Alexandria." (you know, the one that though Dawn and I were doing the exact same thing by her own admission, I was the only one who was "throwing myself at him.")

Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
What a stupid question to ask since she's dead.

You keep saying that. Got a skeleton in your closet you'd like to share, Mason?

Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
Weeper and Columbo are incompetent investigators and dissemblers.

And you're someone who taught at a law school that closed, and is under investigation, because of monetary scandal and accusations of fraud. Weren't you an associate dean there when that happened?

Unlike what you've said about Weeper and Columbo, these are FACTS.

Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
So, you're one of the authors of the she's-alive-and-living-with-a- hunk-in-the-Province-of-Quebec letters.
Better call the cops and let them know because I'm sure they want to verify that statement.
We aren't playing Clue here.
That's showing in the theater across the street.

Wow. You possess AMAZING abilities to make leaps in logic.

Seriously. You expect us to even rebut your posts when it's obvious you've never even heard of frickin' Aristotle? You must have been a terror in high school geometry, all those proofs where you have to prove something logically and factually, STEP BY STEP.

I disagree especially since CW was not
named a supect by LE only in the minds of some.

Nor do I find it professional for a PI
to post such findings on line!

What's good for goose is good for the gander FireCat.

We can agree to disagree on this point!

FireCat wrote:

<quoted text>
Weeper is a private investigator, White Wash. That's his JOB.

Why did Maura delay in getting her driver's license until 20ish? Unusual under most circumstances.
Is it possible her father was a force of excessive force/discipline? Might he have valued his vehicle as much as his daughter....such that her wrecking his car was a heated topic/issue?